Jones v. Barrett
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoffat, J.
Strange as it may seem, although neighbors and adjoining landowners are the parties whose property is alleged to be affected, this action is not between the neighboring landowners. Wolfensperger owns a lot adjoining plaintiff’s lot and immediately west thereof. He built a small dwelling house on his lot. The plaintiff owns a larger lot on the east, upon which is a larger residence.
Plaintiff brings her action for damages, not against Henry Wolfensperger, because he . built a house too large for his lot, nor because of his locating the dwelling too close to plaintiff’s west property line, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Haarstrich v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
- Schmidt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Harvison v. HerrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schwinn v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938