Legal Opinion

Jones v. Barrett

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1934No. 5312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMoffat, J.

Strange as it may seem, although neighbors and adjoining landowners are the parties whose property is alleged to be affected, this action is not between the neighboring landowners. Wolfensperger owns a lot adjoining plaintiff’s lot and immediately west thereof. He built a small dwelling house on his lot. The plaintiff owns a larger lot on the east, upon which is a larger residence.

Plaintiff brings her action for damages, not against Henry Wolfensperger, because he . built a house too large for his lot, nor because of his locating the dwelling too close to plaintiff’s west property line, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Haarstrich v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Schmidt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Harvison v. HerrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schwinn v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API