Reemer v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Aaron Reemer appeals his conviction for Possession of a Drug Precursor, as a Class D felony, following a bench trial. Reemer raises two issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 14, 2003, Kurt Heibler, a loss prevention detective with Meijer, met with Kokomo Police Detective Bruce Rood to turn over the October 2, 2008, video surveillance tapes which showed Reemer purchasing boxes of nasal decongestant.1 A few hours…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- B.K.C. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Cockrell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bunting v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HalstenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reemer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Reemer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005