Legal Opinion

State v. Norton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1984No. 47605PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Judge.

Defendant was charged by information with the offenses of burglary first degree, forcible sodomy, armed criminal action, forcible rape and stealing. A jury found him guilty of stealing but not guilty of all other charges.

Defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence so a brief statement of facts will suffice; The victim testified she was awakened when a man, later identified as defendant, got into her bed and raped and sodomized her at knifepoint. The police were called by the victim’s daughter. When they arrived at the scene the victim escaped through a window.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. BettsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. LumsdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. State v. MudgettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. State v. AbbottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. DeblerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. SweetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Pollard v. WhitenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API