Columbia County Rural Development Authority v. Hudgens
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The single issue on appeal is whether a corporation organized under the Rural Development Authority Act has the authority to exercise the power of eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and equipping a multi-use water supply lake.
The Columbia County Quorum Court approved Amended Ordinance No. 83-1, which recited that the county’s water supply wells for residential and industrial use were being depleted and called for an election to determine whether to adopt a 1% sales and use tax within the county in order to construct a multi-use water supply…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- City of Little Rock v. SawyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Harness v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Arkansas Department of Parks & Tourism v. JeskeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- City of Bryant v. Springhill Water & Sewer Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.