Chruscicki v. Hinrichs
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
The case presents the single question of the validity of the search warrant. If the warrant was valid, the officers were acting within the scope of their authority and are not liable to respond in damages for what they did in executing the warrant.
Two of the officers had resided in Marathon county all of their lives and had often been at plaintiffs’ place of business. They knew the particular place that was to be searched. They pointed out that place on the map when they made the complaint to the justice. They went to the particular place which they had designated and searched it. They did…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
- Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Langen v. BorkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. JohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morales v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Rainey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. BroadwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- State v. BroadwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.