Legal Opinion

Luback v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting upon condition the motion of defendants Hirsch and Schwartz for leave to serve an amended answer, so as to withdraw admissions of allegations in the complaint respecting operation and eortrol of the automobile involved, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The granting of this motion was an abuse of discretion. It operates to the substantial prejudice of the plaintiff and accorded an undue advantage to said defendants despite gross laches on their part. (Dreseher v. Mirkus, 211 App. Div. 763;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drescher v. MirkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Fabio v. Nadler Rental Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Morris v. LuckNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ward v. Davega City Radio, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Nathan v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Sarullo v. Newstand Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API