Legal Opinion

At&T Universal Card Services v. Mercer

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2001No. 98-60693Published

1Opinion of the Court

246 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2001)

In The Matter Of: CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Debtor,

AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES, Appellant,

v.

CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Appellee.

No. 98-60693

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT

March 23, 2001

[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re Benethel Rembert, Debtor. Benethel Rembert v. At & T Universal Card Services, Inc. Citibank South Dakota, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API