Fulp v. Kernersville Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Lyon, J., at September Term, 1911, of Eoesvtii. Appeal by Baltimore Supply Company. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
The Baltimore Supply Company furnished the defendant for its light and power plant material consisting of insulators, wires, cross-arms, transformers, locust pins, oak brackets, and other electrical supplies and equipments. The wires furnished were attached to the dynamo, but were blown down, disconnected, rolled up, and are now in the possession of the receiver in this action, which is a creditor’s bill. Tbe appellant properly itemized its claim and filed tbe same, but tbe appellee denies tbat tbe materials are sucb as entitle tbe Baltimore Supply Company to obtain a lien under tbe statute,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McNeal Pipe & Foundry Co. v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- James v. Greenville Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- General Electric Co. v. Morganton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campbell v. TeepleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Contract Steel Sales, Inc. v. Freedom Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Queensboro Steel Corp. v. East Coast MacHine & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Contract Steel Sales, Inc. v. Freedom Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Jenkins Hardware Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.