Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1904No. L.A. No. 1246PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action to quiet title. As defenses to the action, defendant pleaded the liens for delinquent taxes for the years 1890 and 1893, and prayed that the taxes be decreed valid and subsisting liens upon the property. Admittedly, upon the authority of the City of San Diego v. Higgins, 115 Cal. 170, and Dranga v. Rowe, 127 Cal. 506, the right of action for the collection of the taxes according to the statute of 1880, page 136, is lost. The court decreed, under section 2911 of the Civil Code, and upon the authority of Dranga v. Rowe, that the lien of the taxes was likewise lost, and quieted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. City of San Diego v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Raisch v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Chambers v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Richardson v. RuddyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API