Legal Opinion

Howard R. Marshall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1961No. 6600PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has now been twice tried and twice found guilty by juries upon each of two counts of an information charging violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. This court's affirmance of the judgment of conviction obtained at the first trial, 10 Cir., 258 F.2d 94, was set aside because of extraneous events occurring during the course of the trial which irretrievably prejudiced appellant, 360 U.S. 310, 79 S.Ct. 1171, 3 L.Ed.2d 1250. Such extraneous events (interference by newspapers) did not recur and the instant appeal is now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Baker v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Howard R. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. William S. Lawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Janski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Le Roy Hester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Ned Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. GerhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API