Legal Opinion

Howard R. Marshall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1958No. 5796PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted on two counts of an information charging violation of *96the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The principal issues before us spring from appellant’s contentions that as a matter of law the defense of entrapment was established and that he was prejudiced beyond recall by newspaper accounts published during the course of his trial. ■Other errors assigned question the jurisdiction of the court and the sufficiency •of the evidence to support the verdicts.

The alleged entrapment centers around the activities of Robert E.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Masciale v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Arthur Mares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. DolceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Joseph Bacino v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  5. Ronald Lee Wolfe v. Elbert v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API