Legal Opinion

People v. Jessup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that reversal is required because County Court failed to ensure that his guilty plea was not coerced by an agreement to return forfeited bail money to his mother. Defendant told the court under oath that he had not been threatened or pressured, and *934the record of the plea proceeding does not otherwise indicate that the plea was coerced. Defendant waived his right to appeal as part of his guilty plea and thereafter was sentenced without moving to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction. Thus, although defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. VallejoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API