Legal Opinion

Peebles v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1937No. 2382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By NICHOLS, J.

The council of the Village of Canfield, Mahoning County, Ohio, pursuant to the provisions of the General Code, passed a zoning- ordinance for that village, and in the ordinance established not only residential zones as distinguished from business zones, but also established a setback building line in the residential zones.

Edward J. Peebles violated this ordinance by erecting a business building within a residential zone, and likewise by erecting the same contrary to the provisions of the ordinance relating- to setback building lines. Peebles was arrested upon an affidavit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reid v. Architectural Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API