Legal Opinion
Smith v. Cenarrusa
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1970No. 10724Published
1Opinion of the Court
475 P.2d 11 (1970)
93 Idaho 818
Raymon L. SMITH, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers of the State of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Pete T. CENARRUSA, as Secretary of State, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10724.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
September 9, 1970.
Dissenting Opinion October 5, 1970.
Robert M. Robson, Atty. Gen., and Howard F. Manly, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for defendant-appellant.
Iver J. Longeteig, of Ambrose, Fitzgerald & Longeteig, Meridian, for plaintiff-respondent.
Samuel Kaufman, of Anderson, Kaufman, Anderson & Ringert, Boise, for Citizens for the Protection of Idaho's…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Livermore v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Anderson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.