Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nevada Industrial Commission v. Reese

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1977No. 7901Published

1DissentGunderson, J.

Like my brothers Batjer and Zenoff, I reject the rationale espoused by our brothers Mowbray and Thompson. The Nevada Constitution establishes that the doctrine of separation of powers is fundamental to this state’s system of government. City of No. Las Vegas v. Daines, 92 Nev. 292, 550 P.2d 399 (1976); Dunphy v. Sheehan, 92 Nev. 259, 549 P.2d 332 (1976). Thus, I agree that severely circumscribed judicial review, such as here concerned, will violate separation of powers if such limitations are imposed without prior intelligent agreement. However, in my view, the legislative scheme does not, in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. County Council v. Investors Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API