Legal Opinion
People v. Gonzales
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1925No. Docket No. 1211PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The defendant was charged by information with having violated the so-called Firearms Act of June 13, 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 696), which reads as follows:
“Section 2. On or after the date upon which this act takes effect no unnaturalized foreign-born person shall own or have in his possession or under his custody or control any pistol, revolver or other firearm capable of being concealed upon said person. ...”
A jury having found the defendant guilty as charged, a motion for new trial was denied, and this is an appeal from the judgment and order denying said motion. It is contended in appellant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. EllenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969