Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzales

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1925No. Docket No. 1211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The defendant was charged by information with having violated the so-called Firearms Act of June 13, 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 696), which reads as follows:

“Section 2. On or after the date upon which this act takes effect no unnaturalized foreign-born person shall own or have in his possession or under his custody or control any pistol, revolver or other firearm capable of being concealed upon said person. ...”

A jury having found the defendant guilty as charged, a motion for new trial was denied, and this is an appeal from the judgment and order denying said motion. It is contended in appellant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. EllenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. NavarroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API