In re Registrant G.B.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
*68The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, J.
This is another case concerning a set of bills collectively known as Megan’s Law. The focus of the appeal is on the use of expert *69testimony in determining under that law the risk of reoffense posed by a paroled convicted sex offender.
We thus far have upheld the legislation requiring sex offenders to register with law enforcement, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 to -5, and the act requiring law enforcement, in certain circumstances, to notify community groups and individuals of the presence of sex offenders, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-6 to -11. Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. KrolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. MichaelsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- In re D.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- In Re Registrant J.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- P.T. v. M.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- In re Registrant M.F.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.