Legal Opinion

Colorado Lumber, Land & Improvement Co. v. Dustin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 5237; No. 2861 C. APublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of El Paso County. Hon. James A. Orr, Judge. Action by F. W. Dnstin and W. A. Edmonston (substituted,for Charles Clark), against The Colorado Lumber, Land & Improvement Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice G'oddaed

The question for our determination is whether the court erred in excluding testimony tending to prove the oral agreement relied on by defendant to defeat a recovery of the money judgment for services rendered in pursuance of such agreement; in other words, whether the plaintiffs were entitled to invoke the statute of frauds to avoid , the obligations of the oral agreement under' which the labor was performed, and recover therefor upon an implied assumpsit, notwithstanding the defendant is willing to carry out the agreement on its part.

We think it is clear that this may not be done. The -party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. DraperNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Day v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  4. Crabtree v. WellesIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Philbrook v. BelknapSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garbarino v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Bennett v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. O'Donnell v. James E. Sipprell, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dreier v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API