Legal Opinion

Brockman v. Regency Financial Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2004No. WD 61850PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Jimmie Brockman appeals from the trial court’s grant of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict to Regency Financial Corporation that set aside the jury’s $30,000 punitive damages award in his favor. Brockman argues the trial court erred in granting a JNOV to Regency, because the evidence was sufficient to justify punitive damages, in that it showed Regency’s evil motive or reckless disregard for the rights of others. We find that Brockman introduced sufficient evidence to support the jury’s award of punitive damages on his claim for malicious prosecution. We reverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Fust v. FrancoisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Environmental Protection, Inspection, & Consulting, Inc. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Echard v. Barnes-Jewish HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Kinetic Energy Development Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blue v. Harrah's North Kansas City, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Scott v. Blue Springs Ford Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ullrich v. Cadco, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Payne v. Cornhusker Motor Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Rinehart v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API