Legal Opinion

State v. Barksdale

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 82-204PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

Appellant, state of Ohio, in the case at bar, urges us to hold that a party, who enters premises open to the public with an intent to commit thereon a felonious act, forfeits his right of entry and becomes a trespasser, subject to prosecution under R.C. 2911.13 for breaking and entering. Cognizant of the increased and legislatively unintended exposure to criminal liability such a rule would engender for many defendants, we must reject appellant’s entreaties.

R.C. 2911.13(B), under which appellee was indicted, declares: “No person shall trespass on the land or premises of another, with purpose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Champlin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CarrollOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. SheppardOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State v. LyonsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States v. Operation Rescue NationalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API