People v. Estrada
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PECK, J. *
Defendant appeals a jury verdict of guilty to seven sex offenses. The court also found to be true special allegations on each of those counts. The allegations charged Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a) 1 and statutory sodomy, section 286, subdivision (c). Appellant does not chal lenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal but does make the following contentions specifically alleging error.
1. The court should have granted appellant’s motion under section 995 to set aside the preliminary hearing on the grounds that appellant did not waive his right to a certified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Daly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.