Legal Opinion

Gorman v. City of Haines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1984No. 6622PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BURKE, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and SOUTER, Judge.* SOUTER, Judge.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On February 10, 1978, Jeffery Gorman was hired by the Haines police department under the federal Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) 29 U.S.C. §§ 801-999 (repealed 1982). As a CETA employee Gorman was classified as a temporary employee and was ineligible for benefits under the Alaska Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). Toward the end of April, 1978, he was offered a permanent, non-CETA position on the Haines police force by the city mayor, Gail Wallace,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Champion Oil Co., Inc. v. HerbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kenai Peninsula Borough v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strong v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API