Legal Opinion

Greener Sons v. Southern Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is an action of trover instituted by the Railway Company, referred to herein as the plaintiff, against A. Greener & Sons, referred to herein as defendants, to recover $443.04, the value of a box of gingham alleged to have been converted by the defendants, the declaration averring that same was delivered to the defendants by mistake, and that plaintiff’s demand for the return of said ging;ham'had been refused.

The defendants filed a plea of not guilty.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s proof the defendants filed a demurrer to the evidence, which the court overruled, and thereupon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Insurance Co. v. ThorntonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Memphis City Bank v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Insurance Co. v. HancockTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spellmeyer v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Overholt v. Merchants & Planters BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. Glover v. L. N.R.R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Owen v. Arcata Graphics/Kingsport PressCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Cox v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API