Legal Opinion
City of St. George v. Public Utilities Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1923No. 3957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The city of St. George, hereinafter called plaintiff, pursuant to the provisions of our Public Utilities Act (Comp. Laws 1917, § 4775 et seq.), made application to this court for a writ of review for the purpose of having reviewed certain orders made by the Public Utilities Commission of this state, hereinafter called Commission.
The record upon which this application is based shows that in August, 1921, the Dixie Power Company, hereinafter called *455company, a corporation organized for tbe purpose of furnishing electrical energy for power and lighting purposes, made application to the Commission…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Riggins v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Fjeldsted v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Logan City v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Jesse H. Dansie Family Trust v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016