Wellcome v. Town of Monticello
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Wright county, where the action was' heard by Rea, J., on testimony "taken by a referee.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The villages of Monticello and Moritzious are incorporated under the general laws of the state, each out of a portion •of the-territory of the town of Monticello, in Wright county. One Patterson was, for many years, a resident of that portion of the territory of the town afterwards incorporated as the village of Monti•cello, and, after such incorporation, continued to reside ..there until he became a pauper, in 1883, since which time, down to June, 1888, he -has been continuously supported as a pauper in the village of Moritzious. From and subsequent to March 2, 1887, down to June, 1888, not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Winona v. School-District, No. 82Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Inhabitants of Windham v. Inhabitants of PortlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Bannon v. BowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State ex rel. Oblinger v. SpaudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- State v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peterson v. Town of EmardvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Vesely v. Village of HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933