Legal Opinion
Camp v. Pacific Financial Group
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 11, 1997No. CV 96-1637 MRP, CV 96-2806 MRP and CV 96-3339 MRPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PFAELZER, District Judge.
Background
The defendants have filed motions to dismiss three of the four claims in the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in Michael D Camp, Sue E. Camp, and Dennis M. Camp, as trustees of the PIC Manufacturing Family Trust et al. v. Pacific Financial Group et al., CV 96-1637 MRP (the “PIC Action”). The PIC Action is one of three actions consolidated before this Court arising out of the conduct of defendants Carlton J. Hagmaier (“Hagmaier”), the Pacific Financial Group (“Pacific”) and the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“Guardian”). 1 The TAC…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Impress Communications v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Van Enterprises, Inc. v. Avemco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Sebastian International, Inc. v. RussolilloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001