Legal Opinion
Churchill & Alden Co. v. Ramsey
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1926No. File No. 5658PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbeff, J.
On rehearing. For former opinions in this litigation, see 172 N. W. 780, 42 S. D. 23; 188 N. W. 742, 45) S. D. 454; 203 N. W. 502, 48 S. D. 237.
The ninth finding of fact reads as follows:
“That the said deed in which the said W. H. Ramsey is grantor, and the said' Ella B. Ramsey is grantee, was executed without consideration, and with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the said W. H. Ramsey, including the plaintiff in, this action, and that the said defendant, Ella B. Ramsey, with knowledge of said intent on the part of the said W. H. Ramsey, and to assist the said W. H.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frank v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Tomlinson v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Cole v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Spackman v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Churchill & Alden Co. v. RamseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Buhl v. McDowellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Williams v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Counts v. KarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Meloy v. KellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.