Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Matthews

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1881PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery county; the Hon. Jesse J. Phillips, Judge, presiding,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The general principle that a debtor in failing circumstances may prefer one creditor to the exclusion of others, Avhen he does so in good faith and for a valuable consideration, has been often announced in opinions by this court. Cross v. Bryant, 2 Scam. 43; Howell v. Edgar, 3 id. 417; Powers v. Green, 14 Ill. 387; Wilson v. Pearson, 20 id. 87; Finlay v. Dickerson, 29 id. 9; Hessing v. McCloskey, 37 id. 342; Morris v. Tillson, 81 id. 607.

In Patrick v. Patrick, 77 Ill. 555, Ave held the same doctrine to be applicable to cases of settlement by husband upon the Avife, quoting Avith approval this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Wortman v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Patrick v. PatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. VanDorn v. LeeperIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Whitford v. DaggettIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Frank v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hauk v. VanIngenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Third National Bank v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lambrecht v. PattenMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Schuberth v. SchilloIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API