Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Dougherty

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 3,893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Nineteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused to a dwelling house by blasting upon a street adjoining it. The plaintiff obtained a judgment, and the defendant appealed. Before the time the appeal was taken, the appellant had been adjudged a bankrupt, all his property, debts, and credits having been assigned to his trustee in bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The bankruptcy of Dougherty, the appellant, though adjudicated before the taking of the appeal, will not prevent its prosecution in his name, nor will the respondent be heard to object on that ground. The appeal may be prosecuted in the name of the bankrupt, or in that of his assignee. (Code Civil Procedure, Sec. 385.) Besides, it is shown that the assignee is really conducting the appeal here, though in the name of the bankrupt.

Motion denied.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Box v. KelsoWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Taylor v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Fahlstrom v. DenkOregon Supreme Court · 1933