Legal Opinion
Colahar v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 31, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-426-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Jan’e Colahar (“Jan’e”) and Rudolph Colahar (“Rudolph”) (together “plaintiffs”) proceed pro se and have paid the filing fee. They filed this lawsuit against defendants Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (‘Wells Fargo”) and U.S. Bank, National Association (“US Bank”) (together “defendants”) alleging the wrongful foreclosure of real property located at 53 Hempstead Drive, Newark, Delaware. (D.I. 2.) Before the court are numerous motions filed by the parties. (D.I. 14, 19, 20, 22, 26, 27, 29) ,
II. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NGANDU v. PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025