Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Royall v. Hilliard

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-0820Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MONTE ROYALL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-820 (CRC) CARL HILLIARD, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Charles Monte Royall brings this defamation claim against Defendants Carl Hilliard and Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Royall alleges that Hilliard, his former supervisor at Eckerd, defamed him by asking him to staff a Department of Labor event honoring the plaintiffs in Bostock v. Clayton County,

590 U.S. 644

(2020). Defendants have moved to dismiss. Because Royall does not state a plausible defamation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API