Robinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Chief Judge.
Defendant Fonte Deron Robinson was convicted by a jury of theft by receiving stolen property. He appeals following the denial of his motion and amended motions for new trial.
1. Defendant’s first and third enumerations challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Specifically, citing Dyer v. State, 150 Ga. App. 760 (258 SE2d 620) (1979), defendant contends there was a fatal variance between the crime charged and the proof offered at trial in that the State’s evidence established the elements of theft by taking rather *126than theft by receiving. However, our review of the record…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Sosbee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Dyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Redding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marriott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Shaheed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Petty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.