Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1992No. S91G1111PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether after acknowledging that the defendant’s armed robbery and theft by receiving convictions were mutually exclusive, the Court of Appeals properly affirmed the conviction for armed robbery and vacated the conviction for theft by receiving. Thomas v. State, 199 Ga. App. 586 (405 SE2d 512) (1991).

Relevant to the cert, issue are the following facts: Thomas and a co-defendant, Armour, were charged with the armed robbery of a car and of receiving the car as stolen property. Armour was convicted only of the receiving charge. Thomas,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Sosbee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. State v. SpringerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Dennard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API