Legal Opinion

Yoffe v. Calmar S. S. Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 10, 1938No. 22695-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is a libel brought by a seaman to recover wages as per articles, and double wages, accruing during an alleged period of non-payment after the termination of the voyage. Libelant is seeking relief under Section 4529, Revised Statutes, as amended by the Seamen’s Act of March 4, 1915, 46 U.S.C.A. § 596, for double wagesj

It is alleged that the libelant was signed on the respondent’s S.S. Vermar for a voyage from Baltimore, Maryland to-Pacific Coast ports and return. Also, that the libelant fell ill in the service of the vessel without his fault and was thereby forced to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trintafilas v. Newtex S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. The CubadistDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1918
  3. Halvorsen v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
  4. The David FaustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1867
  5. The LosmarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ladzinski v. Sperling Steamship and Trading Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Alier v. Sea Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  3. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Peart v. Motor Vessel Bering ExplorerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API