Legal Opinion

Peart v. Motor Vessel Bering Explorer

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided November 25, 1974No. A-189-73, A74-11PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.

This cause comes before the court upon defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and motion to require plaintiffs to post security for costs.

Plaintiffs are three persons who were on board the motor vessel Bering Explorer during a 1973 seismic survey of the Beaufort Sea. As an incentive to conduct the survey, plaintiffs were offered additional compensation in the form of a bonus calculated on the number of completed miles of seismic survey. The parties dispute the rate of additional compensation. Plaintiffs contend that the bonus was to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. THE" GRACE LOTHROP"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. ByrneSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. William T. Gardner v. The Tugboat L. N. Danzler, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Norfolk Dredging Company, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. Mahar v. Gartland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sewell v. M/V POINT BARROWDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1983
  2. Kowalik v. General Marine Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Wilson v. HussmanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API