People v. Fordyce

TURSI, Judge.

Defendant, Charles Fordyce, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for return of property. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of rebutting the prima facie case of ownership of the items seized which he claims to have established through his testimony. We perceive no error.

Defendant was arrested while driving a stolen car and subsequently pled guilty to burglarizing a day care center. In this action, he seeks the return of several pieces of personal property, including four cassette players, four tool boxes, five electric drills, and…