Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceShort, Judge
I concur in this court’s opinion. I write separately to express my view that the trial court’s award of $100,000 in pain and suffering damages also is grounds for reversal. The record demonstrates: (a) Gillson admitted she did not suffer any ongoing psychological damages after the harass*844ment stopped; (b) Gillson’s attorney conceded the amount of damages awarded is not supported by record evidence; (c) the trial court’s consideration of medical and psychiatric evidence was contrary to its pretrial order that Gillson’s mental condition would not be considered for purposes of calculating…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCormick v. MalechaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Ahrenholz v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Palmer v. HaluplzokDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969