Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1992No. C1-92-434, C0-92-442Published

1ConcurrenceShort, Judge

I concur in this court’s opinion. I write separately to express my view that the trial court’s award of $100,000 in pain and suffering damages also is grounds for reversal. The record demonstrates: (a) Gillson admitted she did not suffer any ongoing psychological damages after the harass*844ment stopped; (b) Gillson’s attorney conceded the amount of damages awarded is not supported by record evidence; (c) the trial court’s consideration of medical and psychiatric evidence was contrary to its pretrial order that Gillson’s mental condition would not be considered for purposes of calculating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. MalechaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Ahrenholz v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Palmer v. HaluplzokDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API