Legal Opinion

Tower Insurance v. Red Rose Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 14, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered February 13, 2009, inter alia, declaring that *454plaintiff insurer has no obligation to defend or indemnify defendants Red Rose Restaurant and the Romanos (the insureds) in an underlying personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The policy required the insureds to notify plaintiff of a possible claim as soon as practicable. The insureds became aware of defendant Maryann Peluso’s accident on the night it occurred, but failed to notify the insurer of the possibility of a claim until 14 months later. An…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Zletz v. WetansonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. SSBSS Realty Corp. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Recant v. HarwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 310 East 74 LLC v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. 310 East 74 LLC v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Tower Insurance v. R&R Dental Modeling Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API