Legal Opinion

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1937No. 4 Div. 932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.).

The court found that on December 27, 1934, plaintiff was employed by defendant in its acid chamber, and while so engaged a pipe dropped on his foot and acid burned his foot and leg severely, but that plaintiff continued to work, and on January 3, 1935, when he had quit work for the day and was in the washroom, his foot was inflamed and swollen, and defendant’s manager, Mr. Beall, was in there, and plaintiff showed him his foot, and that the acid in the plant had gotten on his foot and it was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jerome H. Sheip, Inc. v. BaerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Modern Order of Pr&198torians v. ChildsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. FooteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nashville Bridge Co. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Jack Cole Company v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Bedford v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. SingletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API