Legal Opinion
Broyles v. Kasper Machine Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 2012No. Case No. 3:09-cv-152Published
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT IAC SIDNEY, LLC, DOC. 56 AND GRANTING DEFENDANT IMS DELTAMATIC GROUP’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 82, AND TERMINATING CASE.
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions for summary judgment, one by Plaintiff Richard Broyles’s former employer, IAC Sydney, LLC, doc. 56, and one by IMS Deltamatie Group, the manufacturer of the machine upon which Broyles was working when he suffered injuries that have left him an incomplete quadriplegic. Doc. 82. Because there is no evidence that IAC Sydney intended…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.