Legal Opinion

Smith v. State ex rel. Collector of Revenue

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1958No. 20971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

The question presented is easily stated though not so easily answered. It is simply whether the plaintiff, Carl T. Smith, Jr., is a manufacturer, or is merely engaged in the business of buying dry beans in large quantities and, after cleaning and packaging them, selling them at wholesale. If he is merely a wholesaler, then he is liable for an occupational license tax in accordance with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 47:351. If he is a manufacturer, then, under the provisions of LSA-R.S.. 47:396 subd. E, he is exempted from the obligation of paying an occupational license tax.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. City of New Orleans v. Ernst & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. City of New Orleans v. MannessiersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. State Tax Collector v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API