Smith v. State ex rel. Collector of Revenue
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
The question presented is easily stated though not so easily answered. It is simply whether the plaintiff, Carl T. Smith, Jr., is a manufacturer, or is merely engaged in the business of buying dry beans in large quantities and, after cleaning and packaging them, selling them at wholesale. If he is merely a wholesaler, then he is liable for an occupational license tax in accordance with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 47:351. If he is a manufacturer, then, under the provisions of LSA-R.S.. 47:396 subd. E, he is exempted from the obligation of paying an occupational license tax.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- City of New Orleans v. Ernst & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- City of New Orleans v. MannessiersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- State Tax Collector v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992