Legal Opinion

Backer v. Gowen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1957No. 3927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Although this action in the court below was primarily in the nature of a suit to quiet title, it is for all intents and purposes an action to establish the boundary between the plaintiffs’ land, namely, S y% SE *4, section 17, and defendants’ land situate along the west line of SW yé SW 14, section 16, T. 21 S, R. 61 E, M.D.B. & M. This boundary in turn is determined by the location of the section corner common to sections 16, 17, 20 and 21 of said township and range. All questions of facts and of law presented to the trial court and raised in this court on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Clement v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Taylor v. FombySupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Rowell v. WeinemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Whitmore v. McNallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanneman v. DownerNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lee v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lee v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Weisberger v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API