Legal Opinion

Page v. Key

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1943No. 2409PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Prior to filing this suit Holland Page, Plenry Cofiield and George Jones, plaintiffs, and C. W. Key, defendant, had been engaged, as partners, in operating a rock quarry. Plaintiffs had purchased the 200 acres of land on which the rock quarry was situated and paid the purchase price of $12,500. At the time of the purchase Key had the land leased for the purpose of mining rock and operating a rock quarry and was then engaged in that business. Plaintiffs instituted this suit to obtain judgment for a two-thirds interest in the land and for an accounting of the partnership…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. ManesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Norwood v. Taylor CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Clark v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Colquitt v. ShellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rowan v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Adams v. Stotts, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BeuhlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Siepert v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Goslin v. BeazleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API