Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

On May 5, 1888, the plaintiff was injured while hauling with a team a load of wood over a bridge on a farm crossing which crosses defendant’s railway. In constructing the railroad, ditches had been cut on each side of the railroad bed, from 10 to 14 feet in width; and, in constructing the farm crossing, bridges had been built across these ditches. The bridges were from four to five feet above the bottom of the ditches.

On September 30, 1881, Azariah Q. Kent was the owner of the farm known later as the “Green Farm,” which consisted of about 200 acres of land, situated on both sides of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Briscoe Home Trustees v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API