Legal Opinion
Holiday Spas v. Montgomery County Human Relations Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 27, 1989No. 63, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
Ch. 27, Article I, of the Montgomery County Code creates the Montgomery County Commission on Human Relations and provides for its jurisdiction. Sections 27-1 through 27-7 of Article I deal generally with the administration, duties and procedures of the Commission. The remaining sections of Article I are divided in four divisions, with each division dealing with a different area of discrimination: Places of Public Accommodation, Housing, Employment, and “Racial and Religious Intimidation.”
Under § 27-6 of the Montgomery County Code, the Human Relations Commission’s duties…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Banegura v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State Administration Board of Election Laws v. BillhimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Maple Tree PlaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Goodwich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- McCrory Corp. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Kim v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.