Legal Opinion
Rebsamen Motor Co. v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 2, 1956No. 5-948PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. SeaborN Holt, Associate Justice.
By this suit appellants, for themselves and all others similarly situated, question the constitutionality and validity of Act 182 of the Acts of the 1955 Legislature, 75-1501 — 1506 Ark. Stats. 1947 Sup.
Their complaint contains these allegations: “. . . 2. Plaintiff, Rebsamen Motor Company, is a corporation organized under and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Arkansas. It is engaged in the business of a motor vehicle dealer in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; it holds a bona fide contract or franchise with the Ford Motor Company, manufacturer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Ex parte DeedsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Gipson v. CrawfisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. PaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, FAYETTEVILLE v. Osage Oil & Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Villa Nova Night Club, Inc. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Airway Drive-In Theatre Co. v. City of St. AnnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Omni Farms, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.