State v. Coleman

Black, J.,

The principal question raised in this appeal, from an order, denying' Coleman post-conviction relief un~> cfer B. C. 2953:21 is whether he was entitled to an evident^ ary hearing on disputed matters raised by him in an earlier proceeding when he sought modification of his sentence for a drug offense, pursuant to Section 3 of Amended Substitute House Bill No. 300. 1 Section 3 contains provisions for the applicability of the lesser penalty structure of the new drug act. Our conclusion is that under the facts and circumstances of this case, he was not entitled to such a hearing, and we…