Hunter v. Benchimol
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant William H. Hunter seeks to reverse a summary judgment in favor of Alberto Benchimol, M.D., on his complaint charging medical malpractice. Jurisdiction was accepted pursuant to rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. Affirmed.
In determining whether summary judgment is appropriate, the Court will consider the facts in a light most favorable to the party against whom the motion was granted. Pendleton v. Cilley, 118 Ariz. 84, 574 P.2d 1303 (1978). The evidence so viewed establishes the following.
Hunter was referred by a Phoenix, Arizona…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Vigil v. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Abernethy v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Harvey v. KellinArizona Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McWain v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- McWain v. Tucson General Hosp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- rasor/miller v. Northwest Hospital LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2017