Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 13, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Baskin,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking in effect:

When a municipality is appropriating money, under the provisions of title 11 O.S. 17-101 (1987), are such appropriations required to be approved by a vote of a majority of the whole of the governing body, rather than a simple vote of the majority of the quorum that might be present?

¶ 1 Title 11 O.S. 11-110 (1981), sets out the general rule regarding quorum requirements and the quorum that is required for a municipality's city council or governing body to act. That section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Granville Alexandrian SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Smith Ex Rel. State v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Sisk v. Sanditen Investments, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Wilson v. Al McCord Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API