Legal Opinion
Sisk v. Sanditen Investments, Ltd.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 1983No. 57587PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Judge:
The gravaman of appellant Helen I. Sisk’s appeal is whether “costs”, as used in 12 O.S.1971 § 1101 1 , includes attorney’s fees. That section reads:
The defendant, in an action for the recovery of money only, may, at any time, before the trial, serve upon the plaintiff or his attorney an offer, in writing, to allow judgment to be taken against him for the sum specified therein. If the plaintiff accepts the offer and gives notice thereof to the defendant or his attorney, within five days after the offer was served, the offer, and an affidavit that the notice of acceptance was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Ferrell Construction Co. v. Russell Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- In Re Adoption of GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Olansen v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyd Rosene and Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency, an Interlocal Municipal Agency City of Winfield, Kansas, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hicks v. Lloyd's General Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Robinson v. KirbieCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Boyd Rosene & Assoc. v. Kansas Municipal GasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.